I DEMAND TO KNOW THE U.S. CODE OF LAW, THAT CRICKET WIRELESS IS REFERENCING, WHEN THEY TELL THEY CUSTOMERS THAT THEY HAVE TO OBTAIN A SUBPOENA, IN ORDER TO ACCESS THEIR CALL &TEXT LOGS, ON THEIR OWN ACCOUNT?
I WAS TOLD BY A CRICKET CSRep THAT THIS SUBPOENA DEMAND IS A CRICKET WIRELESS ...POLICY. THE LAST I KNEW ABOUT U.S. LAW, IS THAT ANY POLICY NEVER OVERRIDES THE LAW, AND ESPECIALLY CONSTITUTIONAL LAW!!
AND CRICKET WIRELESS HAS NO QUALIFIED IMMUNITY, THAT MAKES THEM EXEMPT FROM COMPLYING WITH U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL AND FEDERAL LAW! SO, BY ... WHAT BUSINESS RIGHT AND WHAT U.S. CODE OF LAW, GIVES CRICKET WIRELESS THE AUTHORITY TO DENY THEIR ....PAYING CUSTOMERS... THEIR PRIVATE, INFORMATION, ON THEIR ACCOUNT, THAT CRICKET WIRELESS IS BOUND BY LAW TO COLLECT AND MAINTAIN??!! IF I DON'T GET THE ANSWERS TO MY QUESTIONS, POST HASTE, I'M TAKING THIS MATTER TO MY STATE REP., SENATOR TED CRUZ, THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE AND THE U.S. CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE FOR CELLULAR COMMUNICATION, IN THE FORM OF FORMAL COMPLAINTS OF CONSTITUTIONAL CONSUMER RIGHTS VIOLATIONS!!!
I'LL BE WAITING FOR A TRANSPARENT, STRAIGHT FORWARD, LEGITIMATE, HONEST AND EXPEDITIOUS REPLY AND ANSWER, THAT IS WITHIN MY RIGHTS TO DEMAND BE ANSWERED.
Best answer by James_Cricket
View original