I am a consumer of cellular wireless but I am not an engineer or a regulatory quality expert, so my question is what are the health and safety risks to using cellular wireless? I recently found information online that explains in a graph format that cellular networks, wifi, microwave ovens are approximately 3 GHz in frequency and or wavelength of 10cm. Is this bad to the human body? I usually don't keep my cell phone on all day and only use it when needed.
Page 1 / 2
I don’t know if anyone here will be able to give you an educated response on this, but from online research I have done, I am not too worried about this. It would probably be best to do your own research from reputable websites. 
Userlevel 3
+5
Ditto,
Userlevel 3
+5
I can give you a reasonably accurate answer.
The FIRST thing that you must understand, is that the strength of ANY electromagnetic field falls off in proportion to the SQUARE of the distance from the emitter.
Applying this to your question, I cannot say definitively one way or the other, if the low power emitted by a cellphone causes brain cancer, but the risk is completely eliminated by using a Bluetooth device or a wired headset.
You don't see Police holding their walkie-talkie next to their ear anymore, the radio is on their belt, and the microphone is clipped to their shoulder. At first, one would think this is to keep their hands free, until you realize that you have to squeeze the microphone in order to talk.
This is being written by an Engineer who has been a Ham for 60 years, and had surgery for an Acoustic Neuroma on my RIGHT side! I blame VHF walkie talkies! Once burned, twice smart!
H&S Risk Assessments is a systematic way of looking at an operation in construction or in any work related activity to look at two things -firstly hazards which are anything which can cause harm either to people be they workers or members of the public or to property. That could be a vast number of things from electricity to water to objects falling etc.
Secondly risk which is a measure of the chance that a hazard will cause harm, including how severe and to how many people
A aircraft flying overhead and crashing is a hazard but the risk is very small.
On the other hand working on a live high voltage line without protective equipment where the hazard is electric shock gives a very high risk of shock or death.
So the process of risk assessment is to look at all the hazards in turn in a systematic way, look at the risks. and eliminate them as far as possible https://jbhnews.com/dbol-vs-anadrol-which-is-the-best-to-really-bulk-up-fast-between-anadrol-vs-dianabol/29787/ or if they can’t be eliminated take precautions to reduce the risks for example wearing insulating clothing.
When this process is completed and some risks have not been reduced as low as possible then the remaining hazards and their associated risks should be documented.
But remember Risk Assessment is not a paper exercise.
+1
Many scientists say that it is harmful. But humanity has been using cellular communications for a long time and no special problems have been identified. I just recently wrote about medicine, I used https://studydriver.com/medicine/ for this. And I just put in a paragraph about it. This information is too exaggerated, people like to inflate such news.
+1
Don’t worry, it’s safety
+4
I know that if you’re close enough to a microwave transmitter you can get literally cooked.
Taking care of our health is necessary in order to live long years. Recently I decided to try something new for myself. For example, when I found this site https://www.stress-auszeit.ch/yoga-weekend/ because it helped me to get more information about yogaweekend. It also contributes to the pleasure process.
+3
I am a consumer of cellular wireless but I am not an engineer or a regulatory quality expert, so my question is what are the health and safety risks to using cellular wireless? I recently found information online that explains in a graph format that cellular networks MPO Breakout Cable, wifi, microwave ovens are approximately 3 GHz in frequency and or wavelength of 10cm. Is this bad to the human body? I usually don't keep my cell phone on all day and only use it when needed.
The use of cellular wireless and exposure to electromagnetic radiation has been a topic of ongoing research and debate for many years. While there is still no conclusive evidence that exposure to the radiofrequency (RF) radiation emitted by cellular devices and networks is harmful to human health, some studies suggest that there may be potential risks.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified RF radiation as "possibly carcinogenic to humans," meaning that there is limited evidence of a possible increase in cancer risk associated with exposure to RF radiation. However, the level of exposure from normal use of cellular devices is generally considered to be low enough to not pose a significant risk to human health.
To minimize potential risks, some experts recommend taking simple precautions such as using hands-free devices and texting instead of calling when possible, avoiding prolonged use of cellular devices, and limiting exposure to other sources of electromagnetic radiation like Wi-Fi routers and microwave ovens.
It's important to note that while there are some potential risks associated with exposure to RF radiation, the scientific consensus is still evolving and further research is needed to fully understand any long-term effects. Ultimately, it's up to individuals to weigh the potential risks and benefits and make informed decisions about their own use of cellular devices and exposure to electromagnetic radiation.
I am a consumer of cellular wireless but I am not an engineer or a regulatory quality expert, so my question is what are the health and safety risks to using cellular wireless? I recently found information online that explains in a graph format that cellular networks Quality Bailiffs microwave ovens are approximately 3 GHz in frequency and or wavelength of 10cm. Is this bad to the human body? I usually don't keep my cell phone on all day and only use it when needed.
The use of cellular wireless and exposure to electromagnetic radiation has been a topic of ongoing research and debate for many years. While there is still no conclusive evidence that exposure to the radiofrequency (RF) radiation emitted by cellular devices and networks is harmful to human health, some studies suggest that there may be potential risks.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified RF radiation as "possibly carcinogenic to humans," meaning that there is limited evidence of a possible increase in cancer risk associated with exposure to RF radiation. However, the level of exposure from normal use of cellular devices is generally considered to be low enough to not pose a significant risk to human health.
To minimize potential risks, some experts recommend taking simple precautions such as using hands-free devices and texting instead of calling when possible, avoiding prolonged use of cellular devices, and limiting exposure to other sources of electromagnetic radiation like Wi-Fi routers and microwave ovens.
It's important to note that while there are some potential risks associated with exposure to RF radiation, the scientific consensus is still evolving and further research is needed to fully understand any long-term effects. Ultimately, it's up to individuals to weigh the potential risks and benefits and make informed decisions about their own use of cellular devices and exposure to electromagnetic radiation.
+1
Many scientists say that it is harmful. But humanity has been using cellular communications for a long time and no special problems have been identified. I just recently wrote about medicine, I used https://monetorapk.com/ for this. And I just put in a paragraph about it. This information is too exaggerated, people like to inflate such news.
+1
I am a consumer of cellular wireless but I am not an engineer or a regulatory quality expert, so my question is what are the health and safety risks to using cellular wireless? I recently found information online that explains in a graph format that cellular networks, wifi, microwave ovens are approximately 3 GHz in frequency and or wavelength of 10cm. Is this bad to the human body? I usually don't keep my cell phone on all day and only use it when needed.
The use of cellular wireless and exposure to electromagnetic radiation has been a topic of ongoing research and debate for many years. While there is still no conclusive evidence that exposure to the radiofrequency (RF) radiation emitted by cellular devices and networks is harmful to human health, some studies suggest that there may be potential risks.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified RF radiation as "possibly carcinogenic to humans," meaning that there is limited evidence of a possible increase in cancer risk associated with exposure to RF radiation. However, the level of exposure from normal use of cellular devices is generally considered to be low enough to not pose a significant risk to human health.
To minimize potential risks, some experts recommend taking simple precautions such as using hands-free devices and consult physio and texting instead of calling when possible, avoiding prolonged use of cellular devices, and limiting exposure to other sources of electromagnetic radiation like Wi-Fi routers and microwave ovens.
It's important to note that while there are some potential risks associated with exposure to RF radiation, the scientific consensus is still evolving and further research is needed to fully understand any long-term effects. Ultimately, it's up to individuals to weigh the potential risks and benefits and make informed decisions about their own use of cellular devices and exposure to electromagnetic radiation.
I have a fairly correct response for you.
The first thing you need to know is that any electromagnetic field weakens proportionally to the square of the distance from the source.
You can also search about it on your own but that’s the most accurate which I found.
The inward female life structures incorporates the vagina, cervix, uterus, fallopian cylinders, Salpingostomy and Salpingectomy and ovaries. The vagina is a solid cylinder that interfaces the outside genitalia to the cervix. The cervix is the lower part of the uterus that juts into the vagina. The uterus is a pear-formed organ where a treated egg embeds and develops during pregnancy.
The inward female life structures incorporates the vagina, cervix, uterus, fallopian cylinders, Salpingostomy and Salpingectomy and ovaries. The vagina is a solid cylinder that interfaces the outside genitalia to the cervix. The cervix is the lower part of the uterus that juts into the vagina. The uterus is a pear-formed organ where a treated egg embeds and develops during pregnancy.
+1
The inward female life structures incorporates the vagina, cervix, uterus, fallopian cylinders, 23 tarik nagaland lottery result and ovaries. The vagina is a solid cylinder that interfaces the outside genitalia to the cervix. The cervix is the lower part of the uterus that juts into the vagina. The uterus is a pear-formed organ where a treated egg embeds and develops during pregnancy.
Hi there. Just came across your thread and wanted to share my 2 cents. What do you think about EMF and the clothes people use to protect themselves from EMF? Just curious. I heard mixed reviews about it, so I'd like to know what you guys think. Thanks.
There is even a half set for those that need to reduce down the cost much more. With the Woman Edge, womens left handed irons I observed that the fairway woods were not difficult to send off and had a lot of distance. The short game apparatuses additionally help to increment generally speaking exactness around the greens.Left-gave ladies golf players don't have an excessive number of decisions available, so it's great to have a reasonable and quite often accessible option.The just thing I don't adore about the Visit Edge Woman Edge is the huge hole from the 5 wood down to the 6 crossover.
Hey there! I'm new to this forum, but I saw your post and wanted to chime in. I totally get why people might be concerned about EMFs. We're surrounded by technology all day, every day, and it's natural to wonder if it's having any negative effects on our health. I think wearing such clothes can protect you, but it still won't be enough. Anyway, that's just my two cents. I'd love to hear what other people think about EMF protection clothing. Have you noticed any difference in how you feel?
I can give you a reasonably accurate answer.
The FIRST thing that you must understand, is that the strength of ANY electromagnetic field falls off in proportion to the SQUARE of the distance from the emitter.
Applying this to your question, I cannot say definitively one way or the other, if the low power emitted by a cellphone causes brain cancer, but the risk is completely eliminated by using a Bluetooth device or a wired headset.
You don't see Police holding their walkie-talkie next to their ear anymore, the radio is on their belt, and the microphone is clipped to their shoulder. At first, one would think this is to keep their hands free, until you realize that you have to squeeze the microphone in order to talk.
This is being written by an Engineer who has been a Ham for 60 years, and had surgery for an Acoustic Neuroma on my RIGHT side! I blame VHF walkie talkies! Once burned, twice smart!
Many scientists say that it is harmful. But humanity has been using cellular communications for a long time and no special problems have been identified. I just recently wrote about medicine, I used https://monetorapk.com/ for this. And I just put in a paragraph about it. This information is too exaggerated, people like to inflate such news.
I can give you a reasonably accurate answer.
The FIRST thing that you must understand, is that the strength of ANY electromagnetic field falls off in proportion to the SQUARE of the distance from the emitter.
Applying this to your question, I cannot say definitively one way or the other, if the low power emitted by a cellphone causes brain cancer, but the risk is completely eliminated by using a Bluetooth device or a wired headset.
You don't see Police holding their walkie-talkie next to their ear anymore, the radio is on their belt, and the microphone is clipped to their shoulder. At first, one would think this is to keep their hands free, until you realize that you have to squeeze the microphone in order to talk.
This is being written by an Engineer who has been a Ham for 60 years, and had surgery for an Acoustic Neuroma on my RIGHT side! I blame VHF walkie talkies! Once burned, twice smart!
Hey there! I'm new to this forum, but I saw your post and wanted to chime in. I totally get why people might be concerned about EMFs. We're surrounded by technology all day, every day, and it's natural to wonder if it's having any negative effects on our health. I think wearing such clothes can protect you, but it still won't be enough. Anyway, that's just my two cents. I'd love to hear what other people think about EMF protection clothing. Have you noticed any difference in how you feel?
The available scientific data on exposure to radio frequency energy show no categorical proof of any adverse biological effects other than tissue heating. Public health data show no association between exposure to radio frequency energy from cell phone use and health problems.
Hi there. Just came across your thread and wanted to share my 2 cents. What do you think about EMF and the clothes people use to protect themselves from EMF? Just curious. I heard mixed reviews about it, so I'd like to know what you guys think. Thanks.
Page 1 / 2
Reply
Login to the community
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.